Compensation Survey · 2025Fortner Bayens, PC · 36th Edition·n = 132 banks · 19 states

What community banks
pay for compliance.

Compliance officer total compensation ranges from $81K at the smallest community banks to $112K at banks over $500M, and is rising faster than any other role surveyed. Salary, bonus, and three-year trends from the 2025 Fortner Bayens compensation survey.

$112K
Total comp, median bank
over $500M in assets
+5.89%
YoY raise for compliance officers
fastest of any role surveyed
+8.6%
3-year growth in average
compliance officer total comp
132
Bank responses across
19 states, 2025 survey
About this survey

Why Canarie publishes it.

A community bank's biggest line item, after interest expense, is people. Compliance, in particular, has become the fastest-rising labor line, growing 5.9% in 2025 against an all-bank average raise of 2.8%.

The Fortner Bayens survey is the most-cited compensation dataset for independent community banks west of the Mississippi. The figures below are reproduced from the 2025 edition, paired with our analysis of what they mean for the cost of a compliant operation. They contextualize the dollar ranges in the Compliance Cost Index that follows.

01Compensation by asset size

Pay scales with balance sheet.

Base salary + bonus · Median bank, by tier
$0K$25K$50K$75K$100K$125K< $100M$81K$100–150M$88K$150–250M$98K$250–500M$112K> $500M$112KBASE SALARYBONUS

Source: Fortner Bayens 2025 Compensation Survey. n = 132 community banks across 19 states. Bonus = cash incentive compensation, excludes equity and deferred plans.

A compliance officer at the smallest community banks earns roughly $81K in total cash compensation. At banks over $250M, that climbs to $112K+.

The jump from the $150–250M tier to the $250–500M tier is the largest in the dataset, a +$14K step. This is the point at which most community banks move from a generalist compliance officer to a credentialed BSA officer and dedicated compliance manager.

Bonuses tell their own story. Below $100M they round to $3K; above $250M they exceed $11K and approach 12% of base. Variable comp is now the lever community banks use to compete for compliance talent.

Asset sizeBase salaryBonusTotal compYoY raise
< $100M$77,984$2,955$80,938+2.00%
$100–150M$79,563$8,728$88,291+3.23%
$150–250M$90,601$7,559$98,160+5.24%
$250–500M$100,814$11,575$112,389+7.14%
> $500M$101,343$11,141$112,484+5.57%
02Three-year compensation trend

Rising faster than any other role.

2023 → 2025 · Average and median total comp
$80K$85K$90K$95K$100K$105K$110K202320242025$94.1K$100.0K$102.1K$86.0K$91.7K$100.6KAVERAGEMEDIAN

Average compliance officer comp moved from $94K in 2023 to $102K in 2025, up 8.6% in three years. The median grew faster still, narrowing the gap between average and median by $6K.

The compression between average and median is the interesting signal: the smaller banks that pull the median down are catching up, raising compliance pay to retain officers who would otherwise be poached by larger institutions and fintechs.

Against an all-bank average raise of 2.8%, compliance officer raises came in at 5.89%, faster than CEO raises of 4.44%. The talent squeeze is real and recent.

+2.8%
All-bank average raise
+4.44%
President / CEO raise
+5.89%
Compliance officer raise
+8.6%
3-year comp growth
03Compensation by region

The geography of compliance pay.

7 regions · weighted by survey response

Mountain states pay a $108K average for compliance officers, the highest of any well-represented region. The Plains follow at $106K. Regions with small sample sizes (≤ 6 banks) are shown for completeness but should not be read as broadly representative.

Mountain
CO/ID/MT/UT/WY
$108K
total comp
n = 34
Plains
IA/KS/MO/ND/NE/SD
$106K
total comp
n = 25
Mid-Atlantic
MD/NJ/NY/PA/WV
$97K
total comp
n = 1
South
AR/LA/NM/OK/TX
$96K
total comp
n = 19
Great Lakes
IL/IN/MI/MN/OH/WI
$90K
total comp
n = 6
Southeast
AL/FL/GA/KY/MS/NC/SC/TN
$87K
total comp
n = 1
Northwest
AK/OR/WA
$49K
total comp
n = 1

Bars in muted grey indicate regions with fewer than 7 survey responses; treat as directional only. Mountain (CO/ID/MT/UT/WY) and Plains (IA/KS/MO/ND/NE/SD) account for 45% of all responses.

04Community type and raises

Where the premium sits.

Comp by community type

Resort$128K
salary $113Kbonus $15K
City > 500K$117K
salary $104Kbonus $13K
City < 500K$103K
salary $93Kbonus $10K
Rural$97K
salary $89Kbonus $8K

Resort markets command a $31K premium over rural — a 32% gap that mirrors the broader cost-of-living spread between mountain resort communities and the agricultural economies that dominate the survey.

2025 raise distribution (all roles)

62.1%0–3%25.8%3–5%5–7%4.9%7.2%7%+
Overall avg. raise2.8%

62% of banks raised base salaries by 0–3% across all roles. Compliance officers specifically saw +5.89% — more than 2x the all-role average.

05Executive comp for context

What the C-suite earns.

All-banks average · Range across asset tiers

Compliance comp is additive to existing leadership spend. These figures anchor the conversation: when a bank says it cannot afford a dedicated compliance hire, the comparable line is usually a second lending officer or an EVP's incentive plan.

RoleBase salary rangeTotal comp rangevs. compliance officer
President / CEO$196K$302K$167K$413Kup to 3.7×
CFO$122K$188K$143K$239Kup to 2.1×
COO$114K$181K$127K$222Kup to 2.0×
Senior Lending Officer$121K$198K$139K$242Kup to 2.2×
Compliance Officer (top tier)$77,984 – $101,343$80,938 – $112,4841.0×
06Survey demographics

Who answered the survey.

132 banks · 19 states · 67% rural

Top states by responses

Colorado
31
Nebraska
17
Wyoming
10
Iowa
10
Texas
10
Oklahoma
9
Kansas
9
132
Bank responses
19
States covered
67%
Rural banks
Key takeaway

Compliance officer salaries grew faster than CEO salaries in 2025 (5.89% vs 4.44%). The fight for compliance talent has overtaken the fight for executive talent at community banks.

Source

Fortner Bayens, PC — 2025 Independent Financial Institution Compensation Survey, 36th Edition, October 2025. Contact: Philip Schuyler, schuylerp@fbl.cpa · www.fbl.cpa.

What this means for your bank

A compliance officer costs $112K+ before benefits.

Below: how much of your bank's operating expense actually goes to compliance, what your peers spend, and where you rank in your state and asset tier — built from the same FFIEC call report data the regulators use.

Continue to the Cost Index ↓
Issue No. 01 · Q4 2025FFIEC Call Report Analysis·Public Report

The Community Bank
Compliance Cost Index.

A peer benchmark of operating efficiency and estimated compliance spend across 4,053 U.S. community banks. Built from FFIEC call report data, Q1–Q4 2025.

63.0%
National median
efficiency ratio
12.6pts
Spread, smallest
vs. largest tier
$763K/yr
Estimated annual compliance spend,
median bank (upper bound)
52
States & territories
ranked this edition
About this Index

Why Canarie publishes it.

Canarie builds compliance automation for community banks: document review, exam preparation, and BSA/AML and CRA workflows.

The FFIEC publishes the underlying numbers every quarter. We read them so the conversation about where compliance cost lives, and how it scales with bank size, can be grounded in data instead of anecdote.

The Index is free and ungated. The methodology is fully disclosed. If a personalized tear-sheet for your institution would be useful, the form at the end of this page will get you one within two business days.

01The national snapshot

The national snapshot.

4,053 banks · 4 quarters · Q4 2025 distribution

Across 4,053 U.S. community banks meeting our peer criteria, the median efficiency ratio in Q4 2025 was 63.0%. The typical bank spent 63 cents in operating expense for every dollar of revenue.

The distribution is right-skewed. A long tail of banks above the 90th percentile, those operating at 83% or worse, pull the average meaningfully above the median. These are the institutions where compliance, technology, and infrastructure costs have begun to compound faster than revenue can keep up.

The trend across 2025 was modestly favorable: the national median fell from 65.0% in Q1 to 63.0% in Q4. Improvements were uneven. The smallest banks captured the least of it.

Distribution, Q4 2025

MEDIAN 63.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%EFFICIENCY RATIO →6560

Source: FFIEC call reports, Q4 2025. n = 4,053 banks. Bins of 5 percentage points.

55.1%
25th pct
63.0%
Median
72.7%
75th pct
83.2%
90th pct

Quarterly trend by asset tier

54%58%62%66%70%74%Q12025Q22025Q32025Q42025< $100M69.3%$100M – $300M64.8%$300M – $1B62.0%$1B – $10B60.7%$10B+56.7%

Every tier improved over 2025, but unevenly. The largest banks (over $10B) compressed their median by 1.4 pts, while sub-$100M banks improved by only 1.0 pts.

The economic gap between tiers is structural. Compliance, core technology, and risk infrastructure are largely fixed costs. A $10 billion bank can spread them across one hundred times more revenue than a $100 million bank, and it shows up in the ratio every quarter, the same way.

The spread between the smallest and largest banks, 12.6 percentage points at the median, is the entire story of this Index.

02The compliance cost estimate

The compliance cost estimate.

5–12% multiplier · Tier-level dollar ranges

If your bank is the median bank: roughly $404M in assets, operating at the national median ratio of 63.0%, you are likely spending between $318K and $763K annually on compliance.

That estimate applies an industry-standard 5 to 12% multiplier to estimated non-interest expense, a range derived from compliance officer surveys conducted by community banking trade associations. As a percentage of revenue, the smallest banks pay roughly twice what the largest pay for the same regulatory perimeter.

Estimated annual compliance cost: median bank, by tier

< $100M
382 banks · median $77M
$66K – $159K
$100M – $300M
1,233 banks · median $186M
$151K – $362K
$300M – $1B
1,423 banks · median $510M
$395K – $948K
$1B – $10B
872 banks · median $2,010M
$1.5M – $3.7M
$10B+
143 banks · median $28,049M
$19.9M – $47.7M

Methodology: revenue proxy = 2.5% NIM × total assets; non-interest expense = efficiency ratio × revenue; compliance share = 5–12% of non-interest expense. Figures are illustrative and intended for peer benchmarking only.

03Asset tier benchmarks

Asset tier benchmarks.

Five tiers · 10th–90th percentile ranges

If the national median is the headline, the tier median is the verdict. The harder question for any community bank executive is where they sit against banks of their own size.

The chart below plots, for each tier, the 25th-to-75th percentile range (the middle half of banks). The dark mark inside each box is the tier median. The thin lines extend to the 10th and 90th percentile whiskers. If your Q4 2025 ratio places you to the right of your tier's box, you are in the worst quartile of your peer group.

< $100M
382 banks · Under $100 million
69.3
69.3%
p25 60.0 / p75 80.5
$100M – $300M
1,233 banks · $100 million – $300 million
64.8
64.8%
p25 56.5 / p75 74.6
$300M – $1B
1,423 banks · $300 million – $1 billion
62.0
62.0%
p25 54.9 / p75 71.7
$1B – $10B
872 banks · $1 billion – $10 billion
60.7
60.7%
p25 52.7 / p75 69.3
$10B+
143 banks · Over $10 billion
56.7
56.7%
p25 51.0 / p75 62.6
04State rankings

State rankings.

52 states & territories · Q4 2025 medians

Geography is destiny in community banking, or close to it. Banks in Utah operate at a median of 51.5%; banks in New Hampshire operate at 81.7%. A 30.2-point gap inside one country, one currency, and one regulatory regime.

Below national − 5 ptsWithin ± 5 ptsAbove national + 5 pts
RkStateQ4 '25
01
Utah
51.5%
02
New Mexico
51.6%
03
Puerto Rico
53.5%
04
Delaware
58.0%
05
South Dakota
58.1%
06
Georgia
58.5%
07
Montana
58.6%
08
Iowa
58.7%
09
California
59.1%
10
Missouri
59.6%
11
Idaho
59.7%
12
Arkansas
59.9%
13
Alaska
60.0%
14
Nebraska
60.2%
15
Texas
61.0%
16
North Dakota
61.0%
17
Nevada
61.1%
18
Alabama
61.4%
19
Kansas
61.6%
20
Kentucky
61.6%
21
Oklahoma
62.5%
22
Maryland
63.2%
23
Minnesota
63.4%
24
Illinois
63.5%
25
Tennessee
63.7%
26
Wyoming
63.9%
RkStateQ4 '25
27
Wisconsin
64.0%
28
North Carolina
64.1%
29
Colorado
64.1%
30
Virginia
64.7%
31
Michigan
64.8%
32
South Carolina
65.0%
33
Florida
65.3%
34
Mississippi
65.8%
35
Hawaii
65.8%
36
Indiana
66.5%
37
Louisiana
66.7%
38
Pennsylvania
67.3%
39
West Virginia
68.2%
40
Ohio
68.7%
41
New York
69.0%
42
Rhode Island
69.1%
43
Washington
69.4%
44
Oregon
69.6%
45
New Jersey
71.9%
46
Maine
73.5%
47
Massachusetts
74.6%
48
Vermont
74.8%
49
Connecticut
76.0%
50
Arizona
77.0%
51
District of Columbia
77.8%
52
New Hampshire
81.7%

Most efficient states

StateMedianvs Nat'lBanks
Utah51.5%11.537
New Mexico51.6%11.427
Puerto Rico53.5%9.53
Delaware58.0%5.016
South Dakota58.1%4.951

Least efficient states

StateMedianvs Nat'lBanks
New Hampshire81.7%+18.716
District of Columbia77.8%+14.83
Arizona77.0%+14.011
Connecticut76.0%+13.027
Vermont74.8%+11.812
Rank
#18
of 52 states
Median Ratio
61.4%
−1.6 vs national
Spread (P25–P75)
16.2
55.4% – 71.6%
Banks
88
23% above nat'l P75
Alabama vs National Distribution
40%
National medianAlabama median
100%

Most efficient banks

Lowest Q4 ratio
BankQ4Δ
SERVISFIRST BANK
HOMEWOOD
31.7-3.0
EVABANK
EVA
39.6-6.8
FIRST JACKSON BANK
STEVENSON
42.0+1.1
COMMERCEONE BANK
BIRMINGHAM
42.50.0
FIRST STATE BANK OF DEKALB COUNTY, INC.
FORT PAYNE
42.7+1.0
FIRST METRO BANK
MUSCLE SHOALS
43.7-2.1
METRO BANK
PELL CITY
47.1-0.1
FIRST COMMUNITY BANK OF CENTRAL ALABAMA
WETUMPKA
48.1-3.9
FIRST BANK OF ALABAMA
TALLADEGA
48.1-5.7
RIVER BANK & TRUST
PRATTVILLE
48.3-1.5

Least efficient banks

Highest Q4 ratio
BankQ4Δ
NOVA BANK
HUNTSVILLE
102.2-35.8
COMMONWEALTH NATIONAL BANK
MOBILE
101.7-12.2
LOCAL BANK
TUSCALOOSA
100.7-7.6
FIRST FEDERAL BANK, A FSB
TUSCALOOSA
97.1-2.7
FARMERS & MERCHANTS BANK
WATERLOO
86.1+21.3
UNION STATE BANK
PELL CITY
82.9-14.1
SOUTHERN BANK COMPANY, THE
GADSDEN
82.8+0.4
BRANTLEY BANK & TRUST COMPANY
BRANTLEY
80.4-9.2
FIRST NATIONAL BANK AND TRUST
ATMORE
78.9+0.1
COMMERCIAL BANK OF OZARK, THE
OZARK
78.9+8.4

Showing top & bottom 10 of 88 banks in Alabama.

Get the full state breakdown with individual bank scores, peer comparisons, and compliance cost estimates.

05The watch list

The watch list.

10 worst per tier · Q4 2025 efficiency ratio

The ten community banks with the highest efficiency ratios in their asset tier as of Q4 2025. It is uncomfortable. It is also entirely public information, sourced from FFIEC call reports, assembled here for the first time as a peer-comparable list.

A high ratio is not, by itself, a sign of poor management: newly chartered institutions, banks executing a major systems conversion, and trust-only institutions all read high for reasons unrelated to operational discipline. We name the banks; the explanation is theirs to provide. Δ shows Q1 to Q4 change. Negative means improvement.

Tier 1 < $100M

382 banks · median 69.3%
InstitutionLocationAssetsQ1 '25Q4 '25Δ
01West Valley National BankGoodyear, AZ$78M143.5142.0-1.5
02Granger National Bank, theGranger, TX$52M138.2139.7+1.5
03Talbot State BankWoodland, GA$53M142.4138.6-3.7
04Tarboro Savings Bank, SSBTarboro, NC$55M142.5137.5-5.0
05Eureka HomesteadMetairie, LA$92M126.6129.5+2.9
06Producer Bank of TexasPowell, TX$54M112.6125.4+12.8
07State National Bank of Groom, theGroom, TX$62M110.8125.3+14.5
08First State Bank of MichiganDecatur, MI$81M136.6124.9-11.7
09Sunnyside Federal Savings and Loan Association of IrvingtonIrvington, NY$87M123.2123.6+0.4
10Vista National Bank & TrustHarveyville, KS$63M98.7113.8+15.1

Tier 2 $100M – $300M

1,233 banks · median 64.8%
InstitutionLocationAssetsQ1 '25Q4 '25Δ
01Midland Federal Savings and Loan AssociationBridgeview, IL$117M114.2132.2+18.0
02Dearborn Federal Savings BankDearborn, MI$289M107.0121.7+14.7
03New Horizon Bank, National AssociationPowhatan, VA$251M134.4120.1-14.3
04United Republic BankOmaha, NE$197M104.6118.2+13.5
05Wrentham Co-Operative BankWrentham, MA$188M124.2118.1-6.2
06Adelphi BankColumbus, OH$106M138.0114.6-23.4
07East Wisconsin Savings BankKaukauna, WI$271M144.8114.2-30.6
08Hibernia BankNew Orleans, LA$246M114.3113.9-0.5
09Sonata BankBrentwood, TN$282M134.2112.9-21.3
10Commonwealth Community Bank, Inc.Hartford, KY$152M136.0111.9-24.1

Tier 3 $300M – $1B

1,423 banks · median 62.0%
InstitutionLocationAssetsQ1 '25Q4 '25Δ
01Generations BankSeneca Falls, NY$347M124.3139.3+14.9
02UnibankLynnwood, WA$409M101.2129.5+28.3
03Community Savings BankChicago, IL$409M144.0128.2-15.8
04Carver Federal Savings BankNew York, NY$696M144.9123.1-21.7
05Piermont BankNew York, NY$520M116.7120.4+3.7
06Haddon Savings BankHaddon Heights, NJ$407M125.1113.8-11.3
07Modern Bank, National AssociationNew York, NY$664M105.6110.3+4.7
08Devon BankChicago, IL$457M123.3109.6-13.7
09First Seacoast BankDover, NH$600M117.8109.6-8.2
10Axiom Bank, National AssociationMaitland, FL$784M97.8108.6+10.8

Tier 4 $1B – $10B

872 banks · median 60.7%
InstitutionLocationAssetsQ1 '25Q4 '25Δ
01Intercredit Bank, National AssociationCoral Gables, FL$1611M137.7138.2+0.5
02Blue Foundry BankRutherford, NJ$2162M118.3108.4-10.0
03Bayfirst National BankSaint Petersburg, FL$1299M79.0108.0+29.0
04Torrington Savings Bank, theTorrington, CT$1014M94.8106.5+11.7
05Evolve Bank & TrustWest Memphis, AR$1287M117.1104.4-12.7
06Patriot Bank, National AssociationStamford, CT$1089M114.9103.2-11.8
07United Fidelity Bank, FSBEvansville, IN$6292M127.8100.6-27.2
08Newburyport Five Cents Savings BankNewburyport, MA$1587M94.595.0+0.5
09Lincoln Savings BankReinbeck, IA$1753M94.494.7+0.3
10Federal Savings Bank, theChicago, IL$1139M101.994.2-7.6

Tier 5 $10B+

143 banks · median 56.7%
InstitutionLocationAssetsQ1 '25Q4 '25Δ
01Flagstar Bank, National AssociationHicksville, NY$87512M102.998.3-4.6
02Arvest BankFayetteville, AR$27787M85.983.4-2.6
03Apple BankNew York, NY$19220M83.578.9-4.6
04Bell BankFargo, ND$14444M78.377.1-1.3
05Usaa Federal Savings BankPhoenix, AZ$107989M77.676.0-1.6
06Dollar Bank, Federal Savings BankPittsburgh, PA$12513M78.675.7-2.9
07Plainscapital BankUniversity Park, TX$12750M75.374.5-0.8
08TownebankPortsmouth, VA$19687M69.473.4+4.0
09Toyota Financial Savings BankHenderson, NV$15432M58.973.3+14.4
10Washington Trust BankSpokane, WA$10683M74.471.5-2.8
06The year's biggest movers

The year's biggest movers.

Q1 → Q4 2025 · Improvers and decliners

A 30-point swing in efficiency ratio over four quarters, in either direction, is rarely random. It is almost always the signature of a deliberate intervention, or the absence of one.

Largest improvements, 2025

InstitutionTierQ1Q4Δ
01
Eastbank, National Association
New York, NY
$100M – $300M104.734.6-70.0
02
New Republic Bank
Charlotte, NC
$100M – $300M121.061.9-59.1
03
Salem Co-Operative Bank
Salem, NH
$300M – $1B148.2101.5-46.7
04
Snb Bank, National Association
Shattuck, OK
$100M – $300M110.866.5-44.2
05
Mission National Bank
San Francisco, CA
$100M – $300M128.586.8-41.7
06
Finance Factors, Limited
Honolulu, HI
$300M – $1B120.979.4-41.4
07
Bank Michigan
Brooklyn, MI
$100M – $300M96.055.7-40.3
08
Choiceone Bank
Sparta, MI
$1B – $10B107.367.4-39.8
09
Emigrant Bank
Miami, FL
$1B – $10B110.270.9-39.3
10
Versabank USA, National Association
Holdingford, MN
$300M – $1B96.459.0-37.5
11
F & M Bank and Trust Company
Manchester, GA
< $100M77.540.2-37.2
12
Colonial Savings, Fa
Fort Worth, TX
$300M – $1B91.655.3-36.4

Largest deteriorations, 2025

InstitutionTierQ1Q4Δ
01
Applied Bank
Wilmington, DE
$100M – $300M35.395.5+60.2
02
Redemption Bank
Salt Lake City, UT
< $100M57.896.7+38.9
03
Port Richmond Savings
Philadelphia, PA
< $100M33.771.4+37.7
04
Banner Banks
Birnamwood, WI
$100M – $300M63.4100.7+37.3
05
First National Bank and Trust Company of Miami, the
Miami, OK
$100M – $300M45.778.3+32.6
06
Bayfirst National Bank
Saint Petersburg, FL
$1B – $10B79.0108.0+29.0
07
Unibank
Lynnwood, WA
$300M – $1B101.2129.5+28.3
08
Bank of Wiggins
Wiggins, MS
$100M – $300M74.2101.7+27.6
09
Peoples Bank of Kankakee County
Bourbonnais, IL
$300M – $1B29.855.6+25.9
10
Farmers State Bank of Aliceville, Kansas, the
Westphalia, KS
$100M – $300M50.375.3+25.1
11
Security State Bank
Alexandria, SD
$100M – $300M46.070.8+24.9
12
Commercial State Bank
Republican City, NE
< $100M39.864.5+24.7
Personalized tear-sheet

Your bank's number, by name.

A one-page version of this Index, personalized to your institution: your Q4 2025 efficiency ratio, your tier and state rank, your four-quarter trajectory, and your estimated compliance spend range, built from the same FFIEC data used in this report.

30-min callNo commitmentPersonalized data

Book a short call and we'll walk you through your institution's numbers. Your personalized tear-sheet will follow within two business days.

07Methodology

Methodology.

Source · Peer set · Formulas · Disclosure

Source data

FFIEC quarterly Reports of Condition and Income (call reports), filed by every U.S. depository institution and aggregated by the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council. All four quarters of 2025.

Peer set

Banks with total assets > $50M and reported quarterly efficiency ratios in [20%, 150%] across all four 2025 quarters. The filter excludes 268 institutions (primarily trust-only entities and special-purpose banks), yielding a peer set of 4,053 banks.

Efficiency ratio

Non-interest expense ÷ net operating revenue (net interest income + non-interest income), per the standard FFIEC definition. Lower is better.

Asset tiers

Five tiers calibrated to community banking practice: under $100M; $100M–$300M; $300M–$1B; $1B–$10B; and over $10B.

Compliance cost estimate

The figures in Section 02 are estimates, intended for peer benchmarking and not for financial reporting. Constructed in three steps:

  1. Revenue proxy: 2.5% NIM × total assets.
  2. Non-interest expense: efficiency ratio × revenue.
  3. Compliance share: 5–12% of non-interest expense.

The 5–12% range is drawn from compliance-officer surveys conducted by the ICBA, ABA, and academic studies of regulatory cost incidence at community banks.

Watch list & movers

Watch list: ten banks with the highest Q4 2025 efficiency ratio in each tier. Movers: fifteen banks with the largest Q1→Q4 ratio decrease and increase, across all tiers.

Disclosure

Canarie builds compliance automation tools for community banks: document review, exam preparation, and BSA/AML workflow systems. We have a commercial interest in the conversations this Index provokes, not in any specific bank's ranking. The data is sourced exclusively from public FFIEC filings; no Canarie customer data is used in compiling this report.