How much time can we save with automation?

Institutions typically report 30-50% reduction in time spent on compliance operations, with the biggest gains in exam preparation.

Will automation reduce our compliance headcount?

Automation handles manual work so your team can focus on judgment-based activities. Most institutions maintain headcount while scaling their compliance capacity.

Comparison

Manual Processes vs Canarie

Manual compliance processes—email reminders, shared drives, tribal knowledge—work until they don't. The true cost includes not just time, but risk: missed deadlines, lost evidence, examiner findings. Compare manual approaches with systematic workflow automation.

Quick Comparison

Feature	Manual Processes	Canarie
Task tracking	Email reminders and memory	Automated scheduling and tracking
Accountability	Verbal agreements	Assigned ownership with audit trail
Evidence	Scattered or non-existent	Captured automatically
Exam prep	3-5 weeks of scrambling	Days with one-click export
Knowledge transfer	Walks out the door with staff	Documented in the system
Scalability	Requires more people	Scales without proportional headcount

When Manual Processes Works

Very early stage with minimal obligations
Testing a new compliance area temporarily

When Canarie Works

Any established compliance program
Teams managing recurring obligations
Institutions facing regulatory examination
Growing organizations

Why Institutions Choose Canarie

Manual processes create hidden costs—in time, in risk, and in examiner findings. Canarie makes compliance operations systematic and scalable.

Calculate Your ROI

Frequently Asked Questions

Other Comparisons

Canarie vs. Spreadsheets

Why compliance teams are moving from spreadsheets to workflow automation.

Canarie vs. Consultants

When to use consultants vs. build internal capability with software.

Ready to see how Canarie compares?

Book a demo to see the difference firsthand.